\documentclass[a4paper,notitlepage]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\newcommand{\strongemph}[1]{\textbf{#1}}
\newcommand{\litfmt}[1]{\texttt{#1}}
\title{}
\author{}
\date{}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
\maketitle

Does the old-style footnote\footnote{such as this one here} work anymore in
the presence of link abbreviations\footnote{as tested by this file}?\footnote{And
does it work if broken into
multiple lines?}

\section*{\label{Testing.link.abbreviations}Testing link abbreviations}

First paragraph. It does
not have anything weird.

\label{Second.paragraph}Second paragraph.  It doesn't have anything weird, either.  There's
just a line that begins with something that looks quite a lot like a
\footnote{linkdata} block.  Do we manage it?

Okay, now for the real\footnote{\url{mailto:some.email@address.fi}} thing.  There should be all kinds of\footnote{\url{ftp://ftp.spoogle.com/}}
links here.  See ``Testing link abbreviations (\pageref{Testing.link.abbreviations})'' to get a hold of what
they all mean\footnote{\url{http://www.meaning.org/}}.  \footnote{This is a longer footnote,
possibly spanning multiple lines.}.

There are longer links: \url{ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc1355.txt} and friends.  The problem with
URIs (\pageref{RFC2396}) is that you\footnote{the reader} have hard time knowing where they stop.
Take for example \url{http://www.plt-scheme.org/}: why is the slash included but
the colon not\footnote{Don't tell me that properly quoted URI's won't have colons in
such positions.  People never properly quote URI's, as required by
RFC2396 (\pageref{RFC2396}).}?  (Another example is
\url{http://c2.com/cgi/quickChanges}, or \url{http://sange.fi/~atehwa/index.html}\ldots{})
And nowadays, you should be able to break long links onto multiple
lines, exactly as demonstrated here\footnote{which is marvellous, or course}.

\url{http://www.now.com/}, here are some
\footnote{See e.g. removal of link data blocks\footnote{\url{../common/removelinkdata.lsed}}} cases of borderline cases between
\url{./Stx-ref.html} and normal
link syntaces\footnote{\url{../common/linking.lsed}} at the beginning of \footnote{lines}[].

Here is also an \includegraphics{pictures/zebra.eps}.  Please jump back (\pageref{Second.paragraph}).
I want you to consider an unadored relative link\footnote{\url{./foo.html}} and
another\footnote{\url{../index.html}}.

\subsection*{\label{w.autolabel.Explicit.label...is.not.guaranteed.to.work.properly.}\label{Explicit.label}Explicit label (is not guaranteed to work properly)}

How do \label{multiple.labels}multiple labels in the same line \label{work}work?
What about \label{Second.label.conflicts}Second-label conflicts?


\begin{center}\rule{0.5\textwidth}{0.04em}\end{center}


This is an interesting way to produce a bibliography:

\label{RFC2396}RFC2396: Uniform Resource Identifies (URI): Generic Syntax
(\url{ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2396.txt})

\end{document}
